White River Township Fire Protection
District
Pre-Meeting
Report for August 7, 2007
Compiled July 30, 2007
- The new station inches ever so closer to a final
completion date. The goal was to have
a date penned for substantial completion at the last on-site progress
meeting, but the building is yet too far behind to arrive at a final finish
date. This will hopefully happen at
the next meeting set for August 8th. The main hold-ups seem to be the electrical
contractor getting closed out and AT&T completing their relocate. Several of the other trades are hinged
on these two items. A full report
will be made at the District Board meeting.
- Cathy Richards (real estate agent working with
us) has been in contact with the department’s legal counsel in setting up
the necessary paperwork for the Bluff
Road property acquisition. Legal counsel should have the resolution
ready outlining the department’s intention to purchase the property should
the appraisals be adequate.
However, as of earlier today, we’ve been informed that Mount
Pleasant Christian Church may be willing to sell two acres of their
property (just across the street) immediately adjacent to their new
building project that just got under way.
The elders have a meeting on August 6th and we should
have more information at the District Board meeting.
- We are expecting to receive the joint appraisal
back on the old Station 51 property any day now. Once that is received we’ll be able to
set the bid price and get the property listed.
- We are currently slated to be on the agenda at
the county commissioner’s meeting on Monday, August 7th to ask
for permission to use county right-of-way for the Station 53 sewer
project. Hopefully we will have an
update at the District Board meeting.
- Jeremy Pell has been working with the
department’s legal counsel in getting his contract and PERF arrangements
made. No word on an actual start
date as of today. There may be some
discussion at the District Board meeting to work out a few details.
- As a follow-up to last months’ meeting regarding
the Builder’s Risk insurance issue, we did some research to figure out
where things stand. After calling
all vested parties, the short answer was that everyone thought that
everyone else was securing the insurance package. I pulled out the specification manual
for the project and it states that the ‘owner’ is responsible for securing
the insurance package. Chief
Tibbetts handled all insurance issues and didn’t recall ever setting this
up with our carrier, no ever being directed to do so. I then called our carrier (after
verifying that no other party held a policy on our behalf) and found that
no policy was ever pulled for the project.
After jumping through two full days of hoops, a package was
immediately secured and is now in full force for the remainder of the
project. I re-questioned about the
claims issue and the agent confirmed that any claim would cause a
substantial increase in premiums due to our past history. She also stated that it didn’t matter
who the policy was with because the carrier would pull a claims history
before determining the next year’s rates.
- Be prepared for the 2008 Budget Approval vote,
which should complete the budget process (at least our part), before it
goes to the State for final approval.
- Well, that’s all for this month.
The next meeting is
scheduled for Tuesday, September 4, 2007.
- Scott