May 10, 2005
Highland Park Homeowner’s
Association
Minutes of May 9, 2005
Meeting
Lisa Wurster
Bill Dickey
Dennis O’Toole
Guest: Fritz Wurster (Grounds Committee Chairman)
Meeting started at 6:00 pm
and adjourned at 8:30 pm. Held at Lisa’s home.
Reviewed
April’s financials. Noted that there are outstanding dues on 3
lots – two homes under construction and one occupied home on
It was noted that there are
two noticeable violations of covenants:
It has been mentioned
several times, at various meetings, that we need to establish a relationship
with an attorney for legal matters encountered by the Association. There were mixed feelings about Sean
Clapp. Some who sat in on the special
December meeting thought he provided adequate advice and some did not. There was some mention about his cost
possibly being exorbitant and that we are unnecessarily paying for his trip
from the north side if we need him to be present at a meeting. It was also mentioned that it may be more
beneficial to hire an attorney versed in real estate matters; Sean Clapp is not
a real estate attorney. Fritz Wurster
was asked at the last meeting if he would get a recommendation from his father
who is an attorney. He suggested Lynn
Grey (who is representing the
The Board needs to decide
how to proceed with establishing an attorney relationship.
Report was provided by Fritz
Wurster (Grounds Committee Chairman) and Bill Dickey (Grounds Committee
member).
The
committee feels it’s imperative to restore a formal street tree plan that was
part of the original subdivision landscape plan. There were several ideas shared in the
approach to restore the original trees.
The committee feels it’s important to ensure that all original locations
for trees be restored with new trees, that the trees
planted are of the right size and species.
One idea was to have the Association restore the original plan –
planting and paying for the trees, and then communicate to the homeowners that
the plan has been restored and that it is their responsibility in the future to
replace damaged or dead trees.
However,
the covenants state that replacing of the subdivision trees are the
responsibility of the lot owners.
Several board members were concerned about the Association voluntarily
paying for an item that is the responsibility of the lot owners. It was suggested that it might be best to
treat this issue similar to the mowing of lots; provide notice to the owners,
allow them adequate time to plant on their own, and if they fail to do so, the
Association could plant the tree and bill the owner.
A
concern was raised about those areas that are not clearly denoted as a spot for
an original tree. How could we prove
that a tree originally existed there? It
appears that there are six locations where there is clear evidence of a
previously existing tree. There are 13
locations where the evidence is not clear.
The
Committee will put together a formal recommendation in writing and will provide
a plot plan with areas denoted for tree replacement. This will come to the Board for a vote.
The
Grounds Committee is unhappy with the landscaping/maintenance of all
entries. They do not believe that there
has been proper upkeep with respect to weeding, trimming of bushes, mulching
around the trees and spring flower plantings.
They believe the entrance has looked much better in the past. They feel that the back two entrances have
been completely neglected, particularly with respect to weeding and trimming of
bushes. The Board feels like this might
be a lack of communication with Jim Keller; he hasn’t had much direction. They feel that Jim will do whatever we want
him to do; he simply needs direction.
There was a misunderstanding about the upkeep of landscaping east of the
creek. Denny thought this was not common
area and had told Jim not to maintain it.
We determined that it is common area, and that needs to be communicated
to Jim. Both Fritz and Bill feel like
Jim needs to be given the opportunity to improve the landscaping and
maintenance, although the other two committee members would like to see a
change in who provides services. The
Board gave authorization for the Committee to take full responsibility for the
grounds and in directing Jim (as long as they operate within budget). Fritz will meet with Jim this week.
-
Slowing traffic down
-
Front entry signage
-
Violation of covenants
by erection of a monument/sign/rock
Fritz
obtained an estimate for repair of the bridges by the creek. The estimate for repair is $6000. We’d like to obtain a quote from another
brick mason; Bill Dickey will obtain a mason’s name from Tom Ray and will
obtain another quote. We will have both
masons give an add’l quote for a limestone cap in
lieu of a brick cap.
Denny was asked by a
homeowner if, when she takes out a big tree, she can burn the brush. We do not believe there is anything in the
covenants preventing this, but Denny will check. He is also having her get approval by the Johnson
County Fire Dept.
He was also asked if
approval is needed to take out a big, dead tree. It is not.
A homeowner wants to install
a bridge in her backyard. Denny will
have her submit the plan to the Architectural Committee.
This discussion has been
moved forward to the next meeting so all Board members are present.
Next meeting
Next meeting will be July 14
at Bill’s house.